Noland Case May Define Artists’ Rights to Repudiate
2013-05-31 08:09:36 未知
Cady Noland won a court ruling this month in the case surrounding her decision to repudiate a work that was to appear at auction. Marc Jancou, whose work was repudiated, had his $6m lawsuit against the artist dismissed because of the artist’s rights under the federal Visual Artists Rights Act (Vara) which allows an artist to protect her reputation “in the event of a distortion, mutilation, or other modification,” according to The Art Newspaper.
Jancou plans to appeal, says his lawyer Tom Sheridan of Hanly Conroy. Jancou is also appealing the same court’s November 2012 ruling dismissing a case filed against Sotheby’s for breach of contract after it withdrew Cowboys Milking from auction. […]
Sheridan hopes the appeals will provide “clarification of the standards courts use” to interpret Vara. Permitting artists to determine those standards, such as how much damage constitutes material damage and how much is just wear and tear, “is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house”, he says.
The next hearing in the appeal of the decision in favour of Sotheby’s is scheduled for 6 June.
(责任编辑:刘正花)
注:本站上发表的所有内容,均为原作者的观点,不代表雅昌艺术网的立场,也不代表雅昌艺术网的价值判断。
对话 | “道法自然” 范一夫山水中的破界与归真
阿拉里奥画廊上海转型:为何要成为策展式艺术商业综合体?
张瀚文:以物质媒介具象化精神世界
翟莫梵:绘画少年的广阔天空
全部评论 (0)